| Printed in the Maui News
Letters
to the Editor, Friday, May 4, 2007
Protecting Taro Production Smokescreen for Activists
After all their complaints that genetic engineering research
would harm taro, it is interesting that anti-biotech activists
failed to support legislation that is a positive step forward.
With leadership from Sens. Russell Kokubun and J. Kalani
English, the 2007 Legislature passed SCR 206, which requested
the Department of Agriculture to develop a taro security
and purity research program. The program includes exploration
of alternative forms of taro research other than genetic
engineering.
One would have expected a rallying cry of support from the
activists. But this didn’t happen. It seems that a
program to stem the decline of taro production in Hawaii
was of little interest. What they really wanted was to stop
genetic engineering research altogether.
Hawaii Crop Improvement Association member companies are
not engaged in taro research because the market is too small.
However, we care about the taro issue because we believe
farmers should have the best tools available to help defeat
invasive species and disease, which includes conventional,
organic and biotechnology practices.
Toward this end, we are working with Dr. John Cho, one of
the leading taro researchers in the Pacific Islands, on revitalizing
his proposal to gather taro cultivars across the state, and
review and update efficient taro growing practices in order
to preserve taro.
We commend legislators like Sens. Kokubun and English and
House Speaker Calvin Say and Rep. Clift Tsuji for taking
decisive action that cuts to the real issues and possible
solutions to save Hawaiian taro.
Adolph Helm
President-elect, HCIA
Hoolehua, Molokai
|